HOME
LEARNING MODULES
BEEF PRODUCTION CALENDAR
CURRENT AG PRICES
PROFIT TIPS
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING
WEB RESOURCES
BEEF REPORTS
BYPRODUCT MANUALS
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
BEEF FORUM
TIMELY TOPICS
FAQs
ASK A SPECIALIST
CONTACTS
RELATED SITES

              beef.unl.edu

WEATHER REPORT

Enter a city or zip  

www.weather.com

University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension MP 80-A

2004 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report

Sodium Chloride Levels for Finishing Feedlot Heifers

Casey B. Wilson, Galen E. Erickson, Casey N. Macken, Terry J. Klopfenstein1

| Previous Article | 2004 TOC | Next Article |

or

Summary

A trial was conducted to establish a NaCl level that maximizes intake and performance while minimizing excretion of Na to the environment. Fiftynine individually fed yearling heifers (803 lb) were fed 113 days. NaCl was added to a corn-based feedlot diet at levels of 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375 and 0.5 % of diet DM. No difference in ADG, DMI or F/G were observed with different levels of NaCl. Results suggest NaCl inclusion in the diet likely is not necessary to maintain acceptable feedlot performance.

Introduction

Sodium chloride is commonly supplemented in feedlot diets at .3 to .5% of diet DM. This level of supplementation has been assumed to aid in improving DMI and performance. With NaCl addition to the diet the level of Na excretion in feces and urine also is increased. The increase in Na in animal waste may cause long term problems in manure or compost applications and runoff application areas. Sodium accumulation in the soil profile will inhibit water infiltration and inhibit the absorption of nutrients in cropping systems. Determining the optimal amount of NaCl to be included in feedlot rations will be vital to long term environmental sustainablility. The objective of this trial was to evaluate NaCl levels to obtain a level that maximizes intake and performance while minimizing excretion of Na to the environment.

Procedure

Fifty-nine spayed yearling heifers (803 lb) were individually fed for 113 days. Heifers were assigned randomly to treatment and weighed on three consecutive days. Revalor-H® implants were administered at the beginning of the trial. Heifers were individually fed once daily using Calan electronic gates. Adaptation to concentrate was attained by increasing intake (0.5 lb/day) from 1.5 % of BW on the treatment diet until ad libitum consumption was attained, approximately 21 days. The basal diet was initially formulated to produce a sodium deficiency. The diet included 42.5% high moisture corn, 42.5% dry rolled corn, 7.5% grass hay, 3% tallow and 5% supplement. Iodine was added to the diet at 1.5 ppm. Five treatments (12 heifers/ treatment) were formulated to provide increasing levels of NaCl; 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375 and 0.5 % of diet DM. Treatments bracketed 1996 NRC minimum Na requirements (0.08% of DM or 0.20% NaCl). Sodium chloride level in the supplement was increased by replacing fine ground corn (Table 1). Treatments then were mixed before feeding by combining low and high NaCl supplements to attain proper treatment levels. Water intake was measured using water meters on a group basis to evaluate average Na intake from water. Feeds and supplements were sampled weekly and composited for Na analysis. Feces and urine were sampled every 28 days and composited to evaluate Na excretion. Fecal output was determined by multiplying DMI by the estimated dry matter indigestibility of the diet (14.7%, 85.3% DMD). Urine volume was estimated assuming creatinine excretion is 12.7 mg/lb of BW and dividing by the creatinine concentration in the urine. Urine creatinine concentration was determined using laboratory analysis (Sigma Procedure No. 558, Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO.). Na analysis was performed on all samples by a commercial laboratory using atomic absorption spectroscopy. Results were analyzed using the mixed procedure of SAS.

Results

Ingredient and water analysis showed increasing levels of Na intake from 1.9, 7.2, 12.2, 17.0 and 22.9 ± 0.46 g/heifer/day with an average of .65 g/day from water. Analyzed Na levels in the diet were 0.01, 0.07, 0.12, 0.18 and 0.23 % of DM. This provides NaCl levels of 0.03, 0.18, 0.31, 0.46 and 0.59 % of diet DM. Analysis of performance data showed no significant difference in ADG, DMI or F/G with different levels of NaCl (Table 2). Overall, NaCl supplementation was not effective in increasing ADG, F/G or DMI. Heifer performance averaged 3.21 ± 0.13 lb ADG with F/G averaging 6.7 ± 0.19. No significant effects were detected for marbling, yield grade or ribeye area (P > 0.10) across all treatments (Table 2). A significant quadratic effect for fat thickness was detected (P = 0.01). The quadratic response was a result of higher fat thickness in the 0.125% and 0.25% NaCl levels compared to lower fat thickness in the 0% and 0.5% NaCl levels. Fecal and urine analysis showed increasing levels of Na in waste with increased feeding levels (Figure 1).

These results suggest that NaCl inclusion in diets at current NRC recommendations or less would be adequate. In an attempt to produce a sodium deficiency, feedstuffs with low sodium contents were used in this trial. In commercial cattle feeding situations some ingredients would contain more sodium than those used here. Alfalfa contains about 0.12 % Na, beet molasses contains 1.48 % Na, corn gluten feed 0.26 % Na and distillers grains 0.30 %Na. Because most commercial diets in Nebraska contain alfalfa and a byproduct or molasses, most diets likely contain 0.05 to 0.07% Na or more and NaCl is likely not needed. Reducing NaCl supplementation in feedlot operations would reduce the excretion of Na to the environment and minimize Na buildup on acres receiving manure and runoff water.

1Casey B. Wilson, research technician, Casey N. Macken, research technician, Galen E. Erickson, assistant professor, Terry J. Klopfenstein, professor, Animal Science, Lincoln.


File MP80 under: BEEF
Issued January 2004; 3,000 printed.

Electronic version issued February 2004
pubs@unl.edu


Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Elbert C. Dickey, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.


RSS Feed University of Nebraska - Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Maintenance University of Nebraska - Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources