HOME
LEARNING MODULES
BEEF PRODUCTION CALENDAR
CURRENT AG PRICES
PROFIT TIPS
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING
WEB RESOURCES
BEEF REPORTS
BYPRODUCT MANUALS
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
BEEF FORUM
TIMELY TOPICS
FAQs
ASK A SPECIALIST
CONTACTS
RELATED SITES

              beef.unl.edu

WEATHER REPORT

Enter a city or zip  

www.weather.com

University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension MP 76-A

2001 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report

The Effects of Post-Harvest Time and Temperature on Glycolytic Potential of Beef Muscle

Dana J. Hanson, Chris Calkins1

| Previous Article | 2001 TOC | Next Article |

or

Post mortem temperature has little effect on the extent of glycolysis in beef muscle. The time of post mortem sampling can impact glycolytic potential values in beef longissimus muscle.

Summary

The objectives of this study were to determine if post mortem temperature affects extent of glycogen metabolism and if sampling time influences glycolytic potential values in muscle. Beef longissimus muscles entered rigor mortis at two different temperatures and were sampled at 45 minutes post mortem, rigor mortis and 24 hours post mortem to determine the glycolytic potential of the muscle. Post mortem temperature had little effect on the glycolytic potential of beef muscle. Glycolytic potential values from samples removed early post mortem were underestimated when compared to samples taken at 24 hours post mortem.

Introduction

Glycolytic potential is a procedure that is commonly used to estimate the ability of muscle to generate lactic acid. Ante-mortem muscle glycogen levels can also be estimated. Knowledge of a muscle s glycolytic potential can help studies on dark cutting beef and other quality defects. It often is assumed that sampling time is not an important consideration, because the glycolytic potential procedure measures glycogen and some of its degradation products; glucose-6-phosphate and lactic acid. There are a number of intermediate products of glycolysis that are not quantified; their omission might influence the glycolytic potential value.

Temperature also may have an impact on the extent of glycogen breakdown, post mortem. This may affect the overall quantities of lactic acid and residual glycogen in muscle used to determine glycolytic potential. The objective of this study was to determine if temperature and time of muscle sampling affects glycolytic potential values of beef longissimus muscle.

Procedure

The right and left sides from 10 steers were randomly assigned to warm (86oF) or cold (32oF) temperature treatments. For the warm temperature treatment, full, bone-in strip loins were removed immediately after slaughter and held at 86oF until rigor (ca. 6 h); then these samples were moved to 32oF. Cold-temperature loins remained within the carcasses, which were stored at 32oF. Longissimus muscle pH was measured every hour to determine rigor (defined as two consecutive pH readings within 0.1 unit). Samples for lactic acid, glycogen glycogen and glycolytic potential (mmol/kg) were removed 45 minutes post mortem, at rigor, and 24 hours post mortem. Glycolytic potential is a procedure that measures the potential for lactic acid production by the muscle. Knowledge of glycogen, glucose-6-phosphate, and lactic acid concentrations (determined enzymatically) allows glycogen levels to be calculated because each molecule of glycogen generates two molecules of lactic acid. These sample were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -112oF until further analysis. Three, 1-inch thick steaks were cut from each loin section to be used for Warner-Bratzler shear determination after one, seven and 14 days of aging. Steaks were cooked on table-top broilers to 158oF prior to cooling for removal of 1/2-inch cores.

Results

Longissimus muscle pH did not differ between hot- and cold-treated muscle at 24 hours (P<.05). The rate of pH decline was different among the temperature treatments, but this had no effect on the final values. These pH data are summarized in Table 1.

With the exception of lactic acid levels (P< .05) at 24 h, temperature at storage (warm vs cold) had no significant effects on lactic acid, glycogen and glycolytic potential at 45 minutes post-mortem (Table 2), at the point of rigor development (Table 3), or 24 hours post mortem (Table 4). Clearly storage temperature (or temperature at rigor) has little influence on the extent of post mortem glycolysis.

Time of storage altered the calculated glycolytic potential in this study. These values increased from 165.4 to 221.6 mmol/kg over a 24-hour period (P< .05) in warm-treated muscle and from 171.3 to 220.1 in cold-treated muscle. Values at 24 hours for warm versus cold muscle were not different (P = .86). These data suggest that glycolytic potential will be underestimated if muscle samples are taken at 45 minutes post mortem. It is likely that substrate (glycogen) is caught in the various stages of glycolysis. These intermediate products of glycolysis are not measured by the glycolytic potential assay. It appears that pre-rigor muscle samples intended for determination of glycolytic potential should be allowed to fully metabolize prior to measurement.

In this study, warm treatment was associated with elevated (P< .05) shear force values at one, seven and 14 days of aging compared to cold-treated muscle. Perhaps the more rapid rate of pH decline in warm-treated muscle did not allow sufficient time for proteolytic enzymes to break down the muscle ultra structure before the ultimate pH was achieved. The mean pH values after six hours post mortem for cold-treated muscle were higher (P<.01) than the warm treated-muscle, 5.54 vs 5.33, respectively. The proteolytic enzymes may have been irreversibly denatured by the low pH, high temperature condition, which would explain the lack of tenderness improvement on days 7 and 14 for the warm-treated muscle.

It can be concluded that temperature has little effect on the extent of post mortem glycolysis in muscle. Measuring glycolytic potential prior to rigor mortis underestimates glycogen by 10-15%. This may be due to the concentration of intermediate products of glycolysis. Muscle samples for determination of glycolytic potential should be taken after rigor to avoid underestimation of glycogen in beef longissimus muscle.

1Dana J. Hanson, graduate student;
Chris Calkins, professor, Animal Science, Lincoln.


File MP76 under: BEEF
Issued January 2001; 3,000 printed.

Electronic version issued February 2001
pubs@unl.edu


Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Elbert C. Dickey, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.


RSS Feed University of Nebraska - Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Maintenance University of Nebraska - Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources