|
University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension MP 76-A
|
|
2001 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report |
High Moisture and Dry-Rolled High-Oil Corn for Finishing Feedlot Steers |
| Wanda Cerkoney, Terry Mader, Fred Owens1 |
| Previous Article | 2001 TOC | Next Article |
or
|
| When fed in the dry rolled form, high-oil corn improved feed efficiency over normal corn. However, high-oil corn did not improve efficiency over normal corn when fed in the high moisture form. |
Summary
Finishing steers fed diets containing dry-rolled high-oil corn had a 2.5% reduction in dry matter intake and 4.2% better feed efficiency than steers fed diets containing dry-rolled normal corn. Hot carcass weight, dressing percent, liver abscess score, rib fat thickness, marbling score and yield grade did not differ among treatments. Steers fed high-moisture high-oil corn had larger ribeye area and greater percent kidney, pelvic and heart fat than steers fed high moisture normal corn. No differences in performance or efficiency were detected from substituting high-oil high moisture corn for normal high moisture corn.
Introduction
Nutritionally modified grain varieties, such as high-oil (HO) corn, have been developed that may improve efficiency of livestock production. Higher oil content of grain increases energy density of the diet and aids in dust control. However, the ideal management systems (processing method; fat, ionophore, mineral supplementation) for nutritionally modified grains may differ from those ideal for normal grain. For example, South Dakota State University researchers detected a processing by corn type interaction between normal and high-oil corn. Dry matter intakes and gains were 5 to 10% greater for steers fed rolled HO corn than steers fed whole HO corn. These results indicate that HO corn may need to be processed prior to feeding to finishing beef cattle. To date, no information has been published on HO corn harvested, stored and fed as high moisture grain to feedlot cattle. The objective of this study was to evaluate high-oil corn versus normal corn when fed as dry-rolled or high moisture grain to finishing feedlot steers.
Procedure
In separate locations, normal (N) and high-oil (HO) corn varieties were planted at the University of Nebraska, Northeast Research and Extension Center in Concord, Neb. Varieties were harvested as both high-moisture (HM) and as dry corn. At harvest each load of corn was sampled and analyzed for DM content. High-oil and normal high moisture corn were harvested at 28 % DM. Corn harvested as HM grain was rolled and stored in two separate bunker silos. Dry corn D) was coarsely rolled prior to feeding.
Three hundred eighty British x continental crossbred steers were purchased in early November 1998 and were processed in mid- to late November. Processing included: weighing, implanting, tagging, vaccinating, and deworming. Weights at processing were used to divide the steers into light (LWG) and heavy (HWG) weight groups. On Dec. 7, the LWG again was weighed and sorted by weight into additional groups and placed into their respective trial pens on Dec. 8. Initial weight for the LWG was an average of full live weights taken on Dec. 7 and Dec. 8. The HWG was treated the same as the LWG, with full live weights taken on Dec. 9 and Dec. 10. Fifteen steers were excluded from the research pool for the following reasons: too heavy, too light, or lame.
The LWG included 200 steers with 10 steers/pen in 20 pens (five weight groups with four treatments in each weight group). The HWG included 160 steers with 10 steers/pen (four weight groups with four treatments in each weight group). Pens were assigned randomly within each weight group to one of four treatments. Each diet contained equal amounts of DM corn from D and HM. This made the four different combinations of N and HO corn in the D and HM form: (1) ND plus NHM, (2) HOD plus HOHM, (3) HOD plus NHM, and (4) ND plus HOHM as shown in Table 1.
On a DM basis, the finishing diets contained 84% corn, 7.5% alfalfa hay, 4.5% liquid supplement, 2.0% soybean meal, and 2.0% Rumensin®, Tylan®, thiamine supplement. Diet ingredients and feedbunk samples were obtained every second week and analyzed for DM content. Corn samples were also analyzed for CP, pepsin insoluble nitrogen and crude fat. High-moisture corn was also analyzed for pH, ethanol and selected volatile fatty acids. Feedbunk samples were analyzed for nitrogen, calcium and phosphorus. Fecal samples were collected from two steers/pen and four pens/ treatment and analyzed for pH, crude fat, and starch content.
The LWG and HWG were harvested after 92 and 81 days on feed, respectively. On day of harvest, liver abscess scores and hot carcass weights were recorded. After a 24-hour chill, rib eye area (REA), rib fat thickness (RF), USDA quality grade, USDA yield grade and percent kidney, pelvic and heart fat (% KPH) were recorded. Tissue samples were removed from the neck region of a sub-sample of carcasses (mean of 20 carcasses/treatment) of the HWG on the day carcass data was collected. Lipid extracted from both the lean and fat tissue were analyzed for following fatty acids: myristic, myristoleic, palmitic, palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic, arachidic, ecosenoic, and summed to calculate total saturated, and mono-, di-, and tri-unsaturated.
Results
Even though HOHM corn and NHM corn were harvested at the same moisture content, HOHM corn had a higher (P < .05) DM content (based on oven DM determinations) than NHM corn after fermentation (Table 2). The CP content was greater (P < .10) for HO corn than N corn as is typical for high-oil corn (Table 2).
Based on analysis of feces from these steers, no differences (P > .05) in fecal starch content were detected among treatments. However, crude fat content of feces was 5.04%, 7.96%, 6.85%, and 6.31% for treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Thus steers fed HODR corn (treatments 2 and 3) had more (P < .05) of their fecal DM as crude fat than steers fed NDR corn (treatments 1 and 4).
When compared with steers fed diets containing dry-rolled normal corn, (mean of treatments 1 and 4) steers fed diets containing HODR corn (mean of treatments 2 and 3) tended to have lower (P < .10) dry matter intakes but had improved (P < .05) feed conversions. No differences (P > .10) were detected in feed intake, gain and efficiency between steer groups fed high-moisture normal corn (mean of treatments 1 and 3) vs high-moisture high-oil corn (mean of treatments 2 and 4; Table 3).
No differences (P > .05) in saturation of fatty acid from lean or fat tissue among treatments were detected. However, steers fed high-oil corn tended to have greater (P < .10) percentages of arachidic acid (C20:0) in both meat (.66 vs .59) and fat (.92 vs .86) samples. Steers fed high-oil high-moisture grain had greater (P < .05) internal (KPH) fat than steers fed normal high moisture grain (2.35 vs 2.30). Feeding a mixture of high-oil grain with normal corn grain (mean of treatments 3 and 4) tended to slightly increase (P < .10) the incidence of liver abscesses when compared to steers fed either grain form alone (average of treatments 1 and 2; Table 4).
Results from this study indicate that substituting dry high-oil corn for a portion of the dry corn with normal oil content in diets for feedlot steers can decrease dry matter intake and improve feed conversion. Although no problems with fermentation of high-moisture high-oil corn were encountered, no performance advantage from substituting high-moisture high-oil corn for highmoisture corn with normal oil content was detected.
1Wanda Cerkoney, research technician, Terry Mader, professor, Animal Science, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Concord; Fred Owens, Optimum Quality Grains, L.L.C., Des Moines, IA.
File MP76 under: BEEF
Issued January 2001; 3,000 printed.
Electronic version issued February 2001
pubs@unl.edu
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Elbert C. Dickey, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.
|