|
University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension MP 76-A
|
|
2001 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report |
Protein Supplements and Performance of Cows and Calves in June-Calving Production Systems |
| Amelia Hopkin, Don Adams, Terry Klopfenstein, Todd Milton, Dick Clark¹ |
| Previous Article
| 2001 TOC
| Next Article |
or
|
| June-born calves grazed through the winter on cows fed protein supplement. Winter gain and summer protein supplement affected gain of yearling steers on summer grass and in the feedlot. |
Summary
Lactating, June-calving cows that received protein supplement January through March maintained a lower body condition than dry June cows. Dry, nonsupplemented cows lost more body condition compared to dry, supplemented cows over that same time period. Juneborn steers wintered at a low rate of gain (.4 lb/day) had higher daily gains on sub-irrigated meadow during May than June born steers wintered at a higher rate of gain (1.6 lb/day). Supplemental protein fed during summer grazing on range increased daily gains for steers wintered at both high and low gains compared to non-supplemented steers.
Introduction
A primary factor in determining economic efficiency in the beef cattle industry is feed cost. A June calving system was developed at the University of Nebraska Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory (GSL) to match the nutrient requirements of the cow to the nutrients available in the forage and to reduce the amount of harvested or purchased feeds that are typically fed in February-March calving systems. The need for protein supplement for grazing winter range after weaning in January has not been determined in the June calving system. Although nutrient content of the forage is low, nutrient requirements of a dry cow in the middle third of pregnancy also are low; therefore, supplemental protein may not be needed. When yearlings are integrated into the June-calving system, harvested and/or purchased feed and labor associated with feeding the calf after weaning from January to grass in May might be decreased by extending the grazing season of the calf through the winter. Grazing by the calf through the winter may be possible by leaving the calf with the cow from January to April, provided the cow is fed supplemental protein. The effect of rate of winter gain on summer gains of yearlings from June-calving systems and the effect of supplemental protein on summer daily gain of yearling steers from a Junecalving system have not been determined. Our objectives were to evaluate: 1) the efficacy of extending grazing of June-calving cows and calves through winter, 2) effects of supplemental protein on dry June-calving cows grazing winter range, and 3) response of Juneborn yearling steers grazing summer range to supplemental protein.
Procedure
Winter grazing for dry and lactating June calving cows
Year 1. June-calving cows (95 head) were allotted equally to three winter grazing treatments: 1) Lactating cows with protein supplement (Lact-S), 2) Dry cows with protein supplement (Dry-S), and 3) Dry cows without protein supplement (Dry-NS). The winter grazing study began Jan. 6, 1999 and ended March 30, 1999. On Jan. 6, 1999, calves from cows in treatments 2 and 3 were weaned. All heifer calves and one-half of all steer calves were weaned on Jan. 6. Steer calves not weaned on Jan. 6 and their dams were assigned to treatment 1. Supplements were individually fed three times weekly to cows in treatments 1 and 2. Supplements were formulated to meet degradable intake protein (DIP) and undegradable intake protein (UIP) requirements of dry and lactating cows. Calves in treatment 1 were weaned on March 31. Body weight, body condition score (BCS), and pregnancy were recorded on all cows. (Table 2).
Year 2. The winter grazing study was conducted from Jan. 6, 2000 through March 29, 2000 during the second year. June calving cows (n=118) were split among the three treatments and all procedures were the same as in year 1.
June-born yearling steers
Year 1. June-born steers (n=62) were allotted to two rates of gain during winter and two protein treatments during summer grazing in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement on Jan. 6, 1999. Rates of gain during winter were: 1) high gain and 2) low gain. Protein treatments during summer grazing on range were: 1) supplemental protein and 2) no supplemental protein. June born steers on high gain were weaned Jan. 6, 1999 and were fed wheat middlings at 2.8 lb/head/day and grass hay at 11.2 lb/head/day to gain 1.6 lb/day during winter. Low gain steers nursed the cows on range Jan. 6 to March 30, 1999 (treatment 1 of the cow study) and gained .4 lb/day. Steers wintered at high and low gain grazed subirrigated meadow from April 30 to May 31 and upland Sandhills range from June 1 to Sept. 9. One-half of the steers on both low and high winter gain treatments were fed protein supplement on range from June 7 to Sept. 8, 1999.
Steers on the supplement treatment were individually fed 2.9 lb of supplemental protein (Table 1) three times weekly. Body weight was recorded at the beginning and/or end of each grazing period through the winter and summer and average daily gain was calculated. Steers were finished at the University of Nebraska feedlot at Mead, Neb. Feedlot and carcass data are not presented in this paper.
Results
Winter grazing of dry and lactating June calving cows
Because there were no treatment by year interactions (P > .10), year effects were pooled across treatments. Cow body weight did not differ between the Lact-S and Dry-S cows nor the Dry-S and Dry-NS cows. Protein supplement appears to be important for dry cows to maintain condition while grazing dormant winter range, as shown by the lower (P < .01) BCS of Dry-NS cows (4.4) compared to Dry-S cows (4.7) on March 30. Lactating cows receiving protein supplement had lower BCS at the end of winter grazing on March 30 than dry cows receiving protein supplement (Table 2; P < .01). Body weight (1226 lb) and BCS (5.4) were similar (P > .10) across all treatments at precalving in June and prebreeding in September for year 1. It is interesting to note that although variation in BCS occurred between the three treatments on March 30, BCS for all treatments was similar at precalving and prebreeding. Percentages of cows pregnant for year 1 on January 6, 2000 were 96.2% for Lact-S cows; 89.7% for Dry-S cows; and 88.0% for Dry-NS cows. Pregnancy data are considered insufficient to draw conclusions until pregnancy data are available for year 2.

Yearling steers
No rate of winter gain by protein supplement interactions occurred (P >.10). Steers wintered at high gain were 57 lb heavier (P < .01) and 24 lb heavier (P < .10) than steers wintered at low gain on March 30 and on September 14, respectively. June-born steers wintered at a low rate of gain had daily gains .7 lb greater (P < .01) than steers wintered at high gain while grazing subirrigated meadow in May (Table 3). Protein supplement increased daily gain of steers by .4 lb/day compared to non-supplemented steers while grazing summer range. Wintering June-calving cows with their calves on range January through March may be a practical method to overwinter calves in yearling systems if cows are fed protein supplement. Daily gain during winter and protein supplement during summer grazing affect daily gains and body weights at the end of summer grazing.

- Amelia Hopkin, graduate student Animal Science;
Don Adams, professor Animal Science, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte; Terry Klopfenstein, professor Animal Science; Todd Milton, assistant professor, Lincoln; and Dick Clark, professor Agricultural Economics, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte.
File MP76 under: BEEF
Issued January 2001; 3,000 printed.
Electronic version issued February 2001
pubs@unl.edu
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Elbert C. Dickey, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.
|