HOME
LEARNING MODULES
BEEF PRODUCTION CALENDAR
CURRENT AG PRICES
PROFIT TIPS
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING
WEB RESOURCES
BEEF REPORTS
BYPRODUCT MANUALS
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
BEEF FORUM
TIMELY TOPICS
FAQs
ASK A SPECIALIST
CONTACTS
RELATED SITES

              beef.unl.edu

WEATHER REPORT

Enter a city or zip  

www.weather.com

University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension MP 71

1999 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report

Crude Protein and Energy
Combinations for Finishing Yearling Steers

Burt Weichenthal, Ivan Rush and Brad Van Peltą

| Previous Article | 1999 TOC | Next Article |

or

Maintaining more dietary roughage during the first half of finishing for medium-frame yearling steers or more than 12.3 percent crude protein throughout did not affect overall performance and carcass values.

Summary

Yearling Angus steers averaging 889 pounds were fed 12.1 or 13.8 percent crude protein with two energy levels during the first half of finishing, followed by 12.3 or 13.8 percent crude protein with the higher energy level during the second half of finishing. In a 126-day trial, finishing performance and carcass traits were not improved by feeding more than 12.1 percent crude protein or more than 56 Mcal/cwt NEg during the first half of finishing or more than 12.3 percent crude protein in the second half. These results indicate increased corn silage levels during the first half of finishing may not reduce overall performance.

Introduction

Protein and energy levels are major inputs in formulating diets for finishing cattle. The goal is to have enough protein and energy in the diet for the age, type and condition of the animal so desirable performance and carcass traits are achieved for a competitive cost of gain. Feeding more roughage in the first half of finishing may be one way to cope with periods when grain prices are high relative to forage. Feeding more protein during the first half of finishing may seem logical when cattle may be gaining at a fast rate, but the additional expense must be covered by improved overall performance.

The objective of this study was to study protein and energy level combinations during first and second half finishing phases on overall performance and carcass traits in Angus yearling steers.

Procedure

Table 1. Composition of diets and calculated nutrient analyses.


Diet 1 2 3 4

Diet composition, dry matter basis
Dry-rolled corn, % 53.5 76.4 61.5 72.2
Corn silage, % 39.6 16.7 15.5 16.7
Alfalfa hay, % 16.1
Supplement 58, %a 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
Supplement 40, %b 4.2
Nutrient analysis, dry matter basis
Crude protein, % 12.1 12.3 13.8 13.8
UIP, % 3.86 4.47 4.18 4.62
NEm, Mcal/cwt 85.7 91.5 85.5 90.1
NEg, Mcal/cwt 56 61 56 60
Salt, % .28 .28 .28 .51
Calcium, % .80 .75 .97 1.07
Phosphorus, % .32 .33 .33 .37
Potassium, % .80 .66 1.00 .74
Rumensin, g/ton 29 29 29 29
Tylan, g/ton 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7

aSupplement contains 58 percent crude protein, air dry basis, with 2/3 of that from urea.
bSupplement contains 40 percent crude protein, air dry basis, with 2/3 of that from urea.

Angus yearling steers averaging 889 pounds were randomly assigned to four pens of seven or eight steers on each of four treatment combinations of crude protein (CP) and net energy for gain (NEg) during the first half of finishing. All pens received the higher energy diet during the second half. The diets shown in Table 1 were combinations of two levels of CP and two levels of NEg in a 2x2 factorial arrangement as shown in Table 2. Diets were based on dry-rolled corn with variation in levels of CP or roughage achieved by varying the percentages of corn, corn silage, alfalfa hay or protein supplement. The CP levels assumed for the corn and corn silage in calculating the diets were 8.8 and 7.8 percent with NEg at 67 and 45 Mcal/cwt dry matter (DM), respectively. Dry supplements contained 58 or 40 percent CP (air dry basis) with about two-thirds of CP coming from urea. Monensin and tylosin were included in all diets at 29 and 9.7 grams/ton, respectively. All steers were implanted at the start of the trial with Synonex S. Carcass data were collected and final weights were calculated by dividing hot carcass weights by a common dressing percentage (62). Results were analyzed by using the General Linear Model in SAS.

Table 2. Performance and carcass results from diet protein and energy combinations.


Diets, first half 1 2 3 4
Crude protein, % 12.1 12.3 13.8 13.8
NEg, Mcal/cwt 56 61 56 60
Diets, second half 2 2 4 4
Crude protein, % 12.3 12.3 13.8 13.8
NEg, Mcal/cwt 61 61 60 60 P-value

Number of pens 4 4 4 4
Number of steers 29 29 29 28
Initial weight, lb 888 890 887 889
Final weight, lba 1321 1324 1281 1316 .35
Daily gain, lb
First half 4.09 4.33 3.84 4.09 .14
Overall 3.43 3.45 3.13 3.39 .35
Feed DM/day, lb
First half 22.2 22.6 22.8 24.1 .12
Overall 23.0 23.1 23.2 24.4 .24
Feed/gain ratio
First half 5.45 5.23 5.93 5.90 .14
Overall 6.73 6.71 7.45 7.20 .13
Gain/feed ratio
First half .185 .191 .169 .170 .13
Overall .149 .150 .135 .139 .14
Hot carcass weight, lb 819 821 795 816 .35
Dressing percentage 59.5 58.9 58.7 59.0 .17
Fat thickness, in .54 .56 .47 .55 .20
Ribeye area, sq in 12.6 12.6 12.5 12.7 .88
Marbling scoreb 6.1 6.4 6.0 6.5 .35
Quality gradec 19.6 19.7 19.1 20.0 .22
USDA yield grade 3.4 3.3 3.0 3.4 .03

aFinal weight calculated by dividing hot carcass weight by a common dressing percentage (62).
bMarbling score: Modest = 6.0-6.9.
cQuality grade: Choice- - 19.0-19.9.

Results

Steers fed 12.1 percent CP in diets with about 40 percent corn silage in the diet DM during the first half of finishing did not appear to gain as fast as those fed about 17 percent corn silage, but overall gains for the 126-day trial were similar for those first half treatments when followed with 17 percent corn silage and 12.3 percent CP in the second half or for those fed 17 percent corn silage throughout the trial with 13.8 percent CP. First half and overall daily gain and feed conversion appeared to be lower when 13.8 percent CP was fed with the lower energy diet during the first half, but that diet included alfalfa hay to meet CP and energy targets while the 12.1 percent CP, lower energy diet included only corn silage as the source of roughage. The calculated NEg levels, however, were the same for these diets. Carcass traits appeared to be unaffected, except for an apparent relationship to the lower gain in the group receiving 13.8 percent CP and lower energy during the first half. The results from this protein level comparison are consistent with earlier data from the University of Nebraska (1994 Nebraska Beef Report, pp. 35-36) in which 12 percent CP resulted in yearling performance unimproved by higher protein levels obtained by urea additions to dry-rolled corn diets containing 5 percent corn silage and 5 percent alfalfa hay as the source of roughage.

Finishing diets based on dry-rolled corn contribute substantial amounts of rumen bypass or rumen undegradable intake protein (UIP), often resulting in dietary metabolizable protein (MP) levels in excess of the amount needed by finishing yearling steers. Evaluating the diets with corn silage as the only source of roughage with the NRC metabolizable protein model showed MP levels more than adequate for finishing Angus yearling steers gaining an average of 3.45 pounds per day for 126 days. The rumen degradable intake protein (DIP) was about adequate in the 12.3 percent CP diet in which two-thirds of the supplemental protein came from urea.

Utilizing more corn silage in the diet (56 Mcal/cwt NEg) during the first half of finishing was not detrimental to overall daily gain, feed efficiency and carcass traits when fed with 12.1 percent CP and followed by 12.3 percent CP and 61 Mcal/cwt NEg in the diet. Using a lower energy level during the first half of finishing allows the flexibility of using more forage when available and priced to be economical on cost of gain. These results, showing higher corn silage levels can be used during the first half of finishing without sacrificing overall performance or carcass traits achieved with higher grain diets, may be especially useful when grain prices are high relative to forage prices.

  1. Burt Weichenthal professor, Animal Science, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska;
    Ivan Rush, professor, Animal Science, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska;
    Brad Van Pelt, research technician, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska.

File MP71 under: BEEF
Issued January 1999; 3,000 printed.

Electronic version issued February 1999
pubs@unl.edu


Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Elbert C. Dickey, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.


RSS Feed University of Nebraska - Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Maintenance University of Nebraska - Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources